TSTP Solution File: SEV409^5 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SEV409^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 09:43:04 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.38s
% Output : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SEV409^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Fri May 3 12:34:30 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.15/0.36 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.CFBMfsegxr/Vampire---4.8_30601
% 0.15/0.38 % (30859)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (30864)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (30861)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (30863)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (30862)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (30860)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (30865)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (30862)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.38 % (30862)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (30862)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.38 % (30863)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.38 % (30863)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (30863)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.38 % (30862)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.38 % (30862)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.38
% 0.15/0.38 % (30862)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.38 % (30862)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.38 % (30862)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.38 % (30862)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (30862)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (30863)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.38 % (30863)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.38
% 0.15/0.38 % (30863)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.38 % (30863)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.38 % (30863)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.38 % (30863)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (30863)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (30864)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.38 % (30866)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (30861)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.38 % (30861)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (30861)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.38 % (30861)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.38
% 0.15/0.38
% 0.15/0.38 % (30861)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.38 % (30861)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.38 % (30859)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.38 % (30861)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.15/0.38 % (30861)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (30861)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (30864)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.22/0.38 % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.22/0.38 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% 0.22/0.38 thf(func_def_3, type, sK0: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(func_def_4, type, sK1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(func_def_5, type, sK2: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(func_def_7, type, ph4: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f31,plain,(
% 0.22/0.38 $false),
% 0.22/0.38 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f30])).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f30,plain,(
% 0.22/0.38 ($true = $false)),
% 0.22/0.38 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f20])).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f20,plain,(
% 0.22/0.38 ($true = ((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ($false)))) @ (sK1 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ($false))))) @ (sK0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ($false)))))))),
% 0.22/0.38 inference(primitive_instantiation,[],[f13])).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f13,plain,(
% 0.22/0.38 ( ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (((X0 @ (sK1 @ X0) @ (sK0 @ X0)) = $true)) )),
% 0.22/0.38 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f11,plain,(
% 0.22/0.38 ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (((X0 @ (sK0 @ X0) @ (sK1 @ X0)) = $true) & ((X0 @ (sK1 @ X0) @ (sK0 @ X0)) = $true) & ((sK1 @ X0 @ (sK2 @ X0)) != (sK0 @ X0 @ (sK2 @ X0))))),
% 0.22/0.38 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f8,f10,f9])).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.22/0.38 ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (? [X1 : $i > $o,X2 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X1 @ X2) = $true) & ((X0 @ X2 @ X1) = $true) & ? [X3] : ((X1 @ X3) != (X2 @ X3))) => (((X0 @ (sK0 @ X0) @ (sK1 @ X0)) = $true) & ((X0 @ (sK1 @ X0) @ (sK0 @ X0)) = $true) & ? [X3] : ((sK0 @ X0 @ X3) != (sK1 @ X0 @ X3))))),
% 0.22/0.38 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.22/0.38 ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (? [X3] : ((sK0 @ X0 @ X3) != (sK1 @ X0 @ X3)) => ((sK1 @ X0 @ (sK2 @ X0)) != (sK0 @ X0 @ (sK2 @ X0))))),
% 0.22/0.38 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.22/0.38 ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : ? [X1 : $i > $o,X2 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X1 @ X2) = $true) & ((X0 @ X2 @ X1) = $true) & ? [X3] : ((X1 @ X3) != (X2 @ X3)))),
% 0.22/0.38 inference(rectify,[],[f7])).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.22/0.38 ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : ? [X2 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X2 @ X1) = $true) & ((X0 @ X1 @ X2) = $true) & ? [X3] : ((X1 @ X3) != (X2 @ X3)))),
% 0.22/0.38 inference(flattening,[],[f6])).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.22/0.38 ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : ? [X1 : $i > $o,X2 : $i > $o] : (? [X3] : ((X1 @ X3) != (X2 @ X3)) & (((X0 @ X2 @ X1) = $true) & ((X0 @ X1 @ X2) = $true)))),
% 0.22/0.38 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5])).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.22/0.38 ~? [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : ! [X1 : $i > $o,X2 : $i > $o] : ((((X0 @ X2 @ X1) = $true) & ((X0 @ X1 @ X2) = $true)) => ! [X3] : ((X1 @ X3) = (X2 @ X3)))),
% 0.22/0.38 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4])).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f4,plain,(
% 0.22/0.38 ~? [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : ! [X1 : $i > $o,X2 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X1 @ X2) & (X0 @ X2 @ X1)) => ! [X3] : ((X1 @ X3) <=> (X2 @ X3)))),
% 0.22/0.38 inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.22/0.38 ~? [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : ! [X2 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X2 @ X1) & (X0 @ X1 @ X2)) => ! [X3] : ((X2 @ X3) <=> (X1 @ X3)))),
% 0.22/0.38 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.22/0.38 thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.22/0.38 ? [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : ! [X2 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X2 @ X1) & (X0 @ X1 @ X2)) => ! [X3] : ((X2 @ X3) <=> (X1 @ X3)))),
% 0.22/0.38 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.CFBMfsegxr/Vampire---4.8_30601',cTHM120_BUG_pme)).
% 0.22/0.38 % SZS output end Proof for Vampire---4
% 0.22/0.38 % (30864)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (30864)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.38 % (30864)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.22/0.38
% 0.22/0.38 % (30864)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.22/0.38 % (30864)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.38 % (30864)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.22/0.38 % (30864)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (30864)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (30858)Success in time 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.39 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------